Login


Wolfe Publishing Group
    Menu

    Shooting the .32 and .38 Smith & Wesson

    Smith & Wesson’s small single-action revolvers in .32 and .38 caliber were very popular.
    Smith & Wesson’s small single-action revolvers in .32 and .38 caliber were very popular.
    Back when Lynn Willecke and I were kids, just old enough to buy our own guns, we’d go to pawnshops and get old Smith & Wesson (S&W) single-action top-breaks in .38 caliber. Those old .38s would cost us only $20 each and the pawnshop dealers would likely give us a handful of cartridges just to get rid of them. We called those guns our “Baby Russians,” but in fact, they were the Second Issue .38s, while the real Baby Russians were the First Issue. Back then, we didn’t know or recognize the difference and probably didn’t care. But those old .38s shot quite well. Now that we’re “older kids,” the delight in shooting those old guns has returned.
    The .38 caliber “Baby Russian” was featured on the S&W letterhead in 1876.
    The .38 caliber “Baby Russian” was featured on the S&W letterhead in 1876.

    Historically, Smith & Wesson’s real foundation rests on the small revolvers, not its big guns. Remember that S&W got its real start with the .22 tip-up revolver. The .22 was expanded, so to speak, to become the .32 rimfire, which, in the No. 2 revolver, paved the way very well for other guns. Yes, the Russian contracts for the .44-caliber guns certainly helped the business, but it was still the small guns where S&W’s future lay.

    Lynn’s .38 shown opened, when all five empties were quickly ejected.
    Lynn’s .38 shown opened, when all five empties were quickly ejected.
    In 1874, the .32 rimfire models were discontinued and by 1876, the First Issue of the .38 S&W was on the market. It was so popular that Smith & Wesson featured it on its letterhead for company stationary. In 1877, a .32 centerfire was planned and that was put on the market in 1878, being called the New Model .32, shooting the new .32 S&W cartridge. By 1892, when the single action .32 was discontinued, more than 90,000 had been produced. The Second Issue of the .38 single actions, which were serial numbered starting from No. 1, was replaced by the Third Model of the single action .38 (which had a trigger guard) after a total of more than 108,000 guns were produced. Those numbers simply emphasize the popularity of those small, single-action revolvers and they do not include any of the double action versions, which were even more popular.

    Our personal interest in these little guns was rekindled fairly recently when Lynn came back from Wyoming with one of the Second Issue .38s with the rather rare 5-inch barrel. We kidded each other about what we’d do with that or similar guns, just like we did back in the 1960s, but the urge to have and shoot the old top-breaks came back like a flood; and that meant that I’d need one, too, which didn’t surprise either one of us.

    Mike got this little five-shot .32 S&W for some fun shooting.
    Mike got this little five-shot .32 S&W for some fun shooting.

    Scouting around turned up a couple of the First Issue .38s (the Baby Russians) plus a Second Issue or two, but what I decided to get was one of the little .32s, and I got one with the 3½-inch long barrel. This gun was nickel-plated, as so many of them were, and some of the original plating still remains. While this .32 is not in new condition on the outside (being just over 140 years old) it still functioned nicely and the barrel showed wear but no pits or other damage. So the little .32 became mine and I can easily say that it delights me.

    With these two old top-break S&W revolvers begging to be used, we both retired to our respective “base camps” and began to prepare some ammunition worthy for our five-shot revolvers.

    For my .32 S&W, I got a set of dies from Lee Precision. Those seem to work quite well and the set of dies came with the proper shellholder. Getting a bullet mould was simple enough; Lyman still catalogs and makes its No. 313249, which is one of the old styles made years ago for the little S&W cartridge. That bullet is listed at 85 grains and only one of the bullets cast from my mould with 25:1 alloy of lead and tin was weighed, with the scale balancing at 83½ grains. Along with that, I also got a .314-inch bullet sizing die, but instead of using the sizer, I find that it’s easy and preferable to simply pan lube the little .32 bullets.

    Lyman’s mould No. 313249 is an old design, made for the .32 S&W.
    Lyman’s mould No. 313249 is an old design, made for the .32 S&W.
    Pan lubing (I just use a large metal jar lid for the pan) did introduce the need for a cutter to cut the bullets out of the lube. That was taken care of by taking a fired case for a .32 Winchester Special, resizing it, then boring out the base so it would accept a rod for discharging the lubed and cut-out bullets. The cutter, made from the .32 Special case, leaves a little bit of extra lube on the bullets but that’s just fine. Bullets are cut from the cooled and almost hard lube one at a time, then pushed back out of the cutter with the metal rod and placed on their bases, ready for loading.

    Next, a load had to be figured out for the new .32 S&W cases that were made by Starline. Old books were consulted, but even the oldest loading manual showed nothing but smokeless powder loads and, just to give a good example of how small the .32 S&W is, a recommended load using the little Lyman bullet was listed with only one grain of Bullseye powder. I was able to find good information in my old copy of the Lyman Handbook #29. (Every black powder reloader should have one of those!) For some guidance on a black-powder load, I turned to old catalogs and cartridge boxes. In the 1916 Winchester catalog, the .32 S&W is listed with 9 grains of black powder and on some of the older ammunition boxes where the powder charge is shown on the label, some of the loads, by UMC I believe, used 10 grains of powder. That gave me something to go on.

    My first try at loading the .32 S&W with black powder used 7 grains of Olde Eynsford 3Fg under the .32-caliber Lyman bullet. That needed too much compression and the bullets simply couldn’t be seated. Perhaps I could have made and used a compression die, but I wanted to keep things simpler than that. So, I reduced the loading to 6 grains and still had the same problem. Following that, the loading was cut down again, to just 5 grains of powder, after switching to 2Fg (for no particular reason), and with that, the powder is still compressed slightly when seating the bullets, but it is slight enough that the bullets in the loaded cartridges are not deformed.

    Loaded in the Starline cases, the little black powder loads for the .32 are ready to shoot.
    Loaded in the Starline cases, the little black powder loads for the .32 are ready to shoot.

    Pan lubing, using a jar lid for a pan, works very well. Note the “custom” cutter.
    Pan lubing, using a jar lid for a pan, works very well. Note the “custom” cutter.
    Shooting those loads in the little S&W revolver was a special treat. But let me put it this way; for revolver shooters who are used to feeling the earth tremble beneath their feet when a shot is fired, they’ll find something missing. The .32 Smith & Wesson is a “pop gun” for sure, but it’s a good one. I did some chronographing earlier with the .32 S&W in a converted .31-caliber percussion revolver and the 5-grain loading, using 3Fg at that time, crossed the screens at an approximate average of 550 feet per second (fps). That works out to less than 60 foot-pounds of energy. Not very earth-shaking at all!

    But it was still a lot of fun and it was certainly black-powder shooting, complete with the small cloud of white smoke…and the accuracy was actually pleasing. We conducted a little test, making it practical by bringing the targets fairly close to these little revolvers by shooting from about six yards. With a rather small bullseye, five shots were fired while holding the little gun over a rest. Delightfully, four of the five shots went through the X ring while the other shot, the “flier,” scored a slightly higher 9. When used within their intended range, the little .32s will provide some good shooting.

    Likewise, a couple of targets were shot at with the .38 that Lynn has. I can’t provide quite as complete a description of the loading process Lynn used for his loads, but he did tell me that he used 8 grains of Olde Eynsford 3Fg under a 158-grain bullet, using Lyman’s No. 358416. He selected that powder charge so the base of the bullet would basically rest on top of the powder, possibly with very light compression. I say that the bullet he used, while a good one, was not designed for the .38 S&W. That was actually the design for the .38 Colt Special, which used a flatnosed bullet, otherwise, the same weight as the standard bullet for the .38 S&W Special. Being heavier (by only 12 or 13 grains) than the standard .38 S&W bullet, the .38 Special bullets were seated into the case further than bullets designed for the .38 S&W, such as Lyman’s old No. 35864, which had only one lube groove, were used. That used up a small amount of room for powder.

    In the 1916 Winchester catalog, the .38 S&W is shown with a 145-grain bullet over 14 grains of black powder. The old Lyman Handbook #29 lists the .38 S&W with a “standard factory black powder” load of 12 grains of powder. Lynn’s loading in his .38, similar to my load in the .32, was close to half of the powder used in the old days.

    Nonetheless, the .38 S&W loads with the 158-grain bullets over 8 grains of Olde Eynsford 3Fg powder shot quite nicely. Lynn’s group with his .38 is a bit wider than my group with the .32, but that can likely be explained by the fact that my gun had a nicer trigger pull than his. Besides, I certainly can’t criticize Lynn’s shooting because, as he’d quickly point out if he could interrupt here, his target’s score was one point higher than mine.

    The little .32 kept them all in the X ring but one, obviously shooter error.
    The little .32 kept them all in the X ring but one, obviously shooter error.

    The .38 S&W black-powder loads were not chronographed. One reason for that is because we had no real reason to do so other than to satisfy our curiosity. Idle curiosity at that, because we have no needs for either our .32 or .38-caliber black-powder loads where power would have any bearing. If power is needed, we’ll both select other guns.

    Lynn’s .38 with the five-shot target, close enough for defense work.
    Lynn’s .38 with the five-shot target, close enough for defense work.

    We’ll certainly be shooting our small Smith & Wesson revolvers some more as they are simply a lot of fun. While shooting them, we get to realize how certain things were in the old days and how the early centerfire cartridges helped pave the way for other/better cartridges yet to come. Yes, you might even say that shooting these old five-shot revolvers lets us be kids again.

    Wolfe Publishing Group